Automatically Adding New Class Instances to a ContainerProblemYou need to store all instances of a class in a single container without requiring the users of the class to do anything special. SolutionInclude in the class a static member that is a container, such as a list, defined in <list>. Add an object's address to the container at construction and remove it upon destruction. Example 8-4 shows how. Example 8-4. Keeping track of objects
#include <iostream>
#include <list>
#include <algorithm>
using namespace std;
class MyClass {
protected:
int value_;
public:
static list<MyClass*> instances_;
MyClass(int val);
~MyClass( );
static void showList( );
};
list<MyClass*> MyClass::instances_;
MyClass::MyClass(int val) {
instances_.push_back(this);
value_ = val;
}
MyClass::~MyClass( ) {
list<MyClass*>::iterator p =
find(instances_.begin( ), instances_.end( ), this);
if (p != instances_.end( ))
instances_.erase(p);
}
void MyClass::showList( ) {
for (list<MyClass*>::iterator p = instances_.begin( );
p != instances_.end( ); ++p)
cout << (*p)->value_ << endl;
}
int main( ) {
MyClass a(1);
MyClass b(10);
MyClass c(100);
MyClass::showList( );
}
Example 8-4 will create output like this: 1 10 100 DiscussionThe approach in Example 8-4 is straightforward: use a static list to hold pointers to objects. When an object is created, add its address to the list; when it's destroyed, remove it. There are a couple of things to remember. As with any static data member, you have to declare it in the class header and define it in an implementation file. Example 8-4 is all in one file, so it doesn't apply here, but remember that you should define the static variable in an implementation file, not a header. See Recipe 8.5 for an explanation of why. You don't have to use a static member. You can, of course, use a global object, but then the design is not self-contained. Furthermore, you have to allocate the global object somewhere else, pass it in to MyClass at construction, and, in general, do a bit more bookkeeping. Be aware that the shared use of a global container like Example 8-4 will not work if multiple threads are instantiating objects of MyClass. You need to serialize access to the shared object through mutexes; see Tutorial 12 for recipes relating to this and other multithreading techniques. If you want to keep track of all instances of a class, you may also want to use a Factory pattern. Essentially, this approach would mean that clients call a function to get a new object instead of using the new operator. See Recipe 8.2 for more details on how to do this. |